House OKs Ackerman legislation to develop statewide standards in consumer education
STATE HOUSE — The House of Representatives today passed legislation introduced by Deputy Majority Whip Mia A. Ackerman (D-Dist. 45, Cumberland, Lincoln) that would require statewide standards in consumer education.
The legislation (2021-H 5491) would require the Council on Elementary and Secondary Education, in consultation with the Rhode Island Department of Education, to develop and approve the standards in public high schools no later than Dec. 31, 2021.
“Many young people just don’t understand the complexities of credit and debt — what it means to have a mortgage that’s under water, or how high interest rates can bury them in debt for their entire lives,” said Representative Ackerman. “They don’t understand that paying the minimum on their credit card bills will keep them paying forever.”
The standards would include instruction in installment purchasing, budgeting, comparison of prices, credit and the law, employment and income, rights and responsibilities in the marketplace, money management, maintaining credit, saving, investing, protecting and insuring assets, and other personal finance or consumer economic topics of study.
“Learning the fundamentals of savings and investing, and how to maintain credit should be as basic as reading, writing and arithmetic in school,” said Representative Ackerman. “How else can we send them out into the real world and expect them to navigate such a complex financial landscape? I want all of these students to come out of school not only with the knowledge to build a skilled workforce, but with the knowledge of how to manage their personal finances instead of spending a lifetime in debt.”
The measure now moves to the Senate, which has passed similar legislation (2021-S 0349) introduced by Sen. Sandra Cano (D-Dist. 8, Pawtucket).
-30-
For an electronic version of this and all press releases published by the Legislative Press and Public Information Bureau, please visit our Web site at www.rilegislature.gov/pressrelease.
The Supreme Court is considering whether Donald Trump is immune from criminal prosecution for acts he took in office. The case before them today centered around Trump's federal election interference charges. Trump's attorney argued prosecuting a president for official acts "incompatible" with Constitution. 
